Skip to main content

When something goes wrong · Scenario · Both sides

The socket is on the wrong side of the window

Situation

Amira notices that a kitchen socket is to the right of a window. The accepted electrical layout shows it on the left. She worries the installer ignored the drawing. The contractor remembers a site discussion but cannot immediately find a recorded change.

Two ways it can go

Escalating

Amira writes: “You have installed this wrong. I am withholding the electrical payment.”

The contractor replies: “You told us to move it. This is why builders hate these schemes.”

The factual question is now buried inside blame and money.

Structured

Amira links a query to the socket work item:

Expected: socket to the left of the window under drawing E-04. Observed: socket installed to the right. Please confirm whether a later change was accepted and provide the record, or propose correction before tiling.

The contractor checks the history. A message shows that Amira asked whether the socket could move, but no final location, price or acceptance was recorded. The contractor accepts that the project record remained unchanged and offers to move the socket before tiling.

Resolution

The correction date is recorded. A completion photograph is attached. Amira closes the query. The milestone history shows the original concern, response and correction.

Why this was not yet a dispute

The parties had a defined factual mismatch and an available correction. No independent adjudication was required. The query created a route for accountability without deciding fault before the record was checked.

General guidance, not legal advice
Was this useful?