Skip to main content
Log inGet started

Work is ready · Scenario · Both sides

The stage is submitted, but the house still looks unfinished

Scenario: A £12,400 structural and weathering milestone on a rear extension.

What happens

Oakfield Construction submits the milestone Structure and temporary weathering.

The completion criteria require:

  • the agreed masonry and structural steel installed;
  • the roof structure complete;
  • temporary weathering in place;
  • concealed-work photographs linked to the relevant criteria;
  • the structural engineer's inspection note attached.

The customer, Lena, visits the site. There are no finished roof tiles, no plaster and no doors. Rainwater goods are not installed. She thinks the stage cannot possibly be complete.

The contractor thinks Lena is about to hold £12,400 for work that was never part of this milestone.

How each side sees it

The customer

The customer's perspective

Lena is not trying to avoid payment. She sees an open construction site and a status saying Submitted for review. She reads “complete” as “the extension is finished”.

Her hidden question is:

If I approve this, am I saying all of that missing work is fine?
The builder

The contractor's perspective

Oakfield has reached the agreed structural checkpoint. The roof covering belongs to the next milestone. Doors and rainwater goods belong later still. Labour and steel costs have already been committed.

Its hidden question is:

Why should payment for this stage depend on work allocated to later stages?

The process that resolves it

Lena opens the agreed milestone rather than judging the whole site.

She sees:

  • roof covering: next stage;
  • external doors: later envelope stage;
  • rainwater goods: later external-completion stage;
  • the engineer's note attached;
  • labelled photographs of the steel bearing and roof structure;
  • the contractor's note explaining the temporary weathering.

She asks whether a small opening beside the temporary covering is intentional.

Oakfield replies with a close photograph and the agreed detail. The opening is part of the temporary ventilation arrangement and will be closed during the next stage.

The question is resolved. Lena approves payment for the milestone.

What the status sequence records

| Moment | Work state | Money meaning | | --- | --- | --- | | Oakfield starts | In progress | The stage was funded, but no completion decision exists | | Oakfield submits | Submitted for review | A completion claim exists; payment has not been released | | Lena asks a question | Submitted for review | Clarification is recorded; no automatic approval occurs | | Lena approves payment | Approved | Release processing can proceed | | Release is confirmed | Completed | The current workflow records payment release |

What did not happen

  • Lena did not certify structural engineering work.
  • Oakfield did not approve its own claim.
  • The attached engineer's note did not approve unrelated finishes.
  • The question did not become a formal dispute.
  • Submission did not itself release payment.

Assurr's role

Assurr gives both parties the same milestone, criteria, evidence, question and state history. It does not decide whether the engineer's opinion is correct or whether the work complies with every legal requirement.

Lesson

The apparent disagreement was not about honesty. It was about the unit of completion.

The house was unfinished. The agreed milestone had been reached. Both statements could be true at the same time.

General guidance, not legal advice
Was this useful?

In the same moment

Related terms